Talk:2018–19 Bangladesh Premier League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding Tables[edit]

Hello,i Added the 3 tables ( [Here ] & [Here]) as statistics at the bottom of this page,i spent 1:30 hours.but a user @A Simple Human: removed them without any notice.In IPL also statistics are updated within a matches.plese take an action,& please recover these tables,
Deleted Tables by user are
Highest match aggregates

Team 1 Team 2 Runs Wickets Overs RR Ground Match Date
Dynamites Riders 364 18 40.0 9.10 Dhaka 11 Jan 2019
Vikings Sixers 331 12 40.0 8.27 Dhaka 9 Jan 2019
Titans Riders 330 8 40.0 8.25 Dhaka 6 Jan 2019
Dynamites Kings 295 15 38.2 7.69 Dhaka 5 Jan 2019

Last updated: 12 January 2019
Most Runs by Players

Player Match Inns NO Runs HS AVE BF SR 100s 50s 0 4s 6s
Rilee Rossouw 4 4 2 186 83 93.00 130 143.07 0 2 0 17 7
Hazratullah Zazai 3 3 0 136 78 45.33 80 170.00 0 2 0 7 12
Nicholas Pooran 2 2 1 93 52* 93.00 58 160.34 0 1 0 8 5
Kieron Pollard 3 3 0 92 62 30.66 52 176.92 0 1 0 7 6
Ravi Bopara 4 3 1 87 44 43.50 80 108.75 0 0 0 6 3
Junaid Siddique 3 3 0 87 33 29.00 64 135.93 0 0 0 8 4

Last updated: 12 January 2019
Highest Totals

Team Score Overs RR Inns Opposition Ground Match Date
Dynamites 192/6 20.0 9.60 1 Titans Dhaka 8 Jan 2019
Dynamites 189/5 20.0 9.45 1 Kings Dhaka 5 Jan 2019
Dynamites 183/9 20.0 9.15 1 Riders Dhaka 11 Jan 2019
Riders 181/9 20.0 9.05 2 Dynamites Dhaka 11 Jan 2019
Riders 169/3 20.0 8.45 1 Titans Dhaka 6 Jan 2019
Sixers 168/5 20.0 8.40 1 Vikings Dhaka 9 Jan 2019
Vikings 163/7 20.0 8.15 2 Sixers Dhaka 9 Jan 2019
Titans 161/5 20.0 8.05 2 Riders Dhaka 6 Jan 2019
Victorians 130/5 18.4 6.96 2 Kings Dhaka 11 Jan 2019
Victorians 130/6 19.5 6.55 2 Sixers Dhaka 6 Jan 2019

Last updated: 12 January 2019

thanks(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk))


First, the tables doesn't have the appearance of the tables of previous season. Second, adding the table now will require constant updates. Doing so later on will save much of the work. And third, there was no source provided. Human (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A Simple Human: Before deleting those tables, you should first discus it on my talk page. You did not do that. You have no reason to remove those tables.these tables are necessary(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I know they are. First, read what I wrote above. I have discussed about it in my talk page already. No need to discuss it again somewhere else. Human (talk) 05:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A Simple Human: Firstly I spent 1:30 hours for statics,you remove them under seconds without any note.i did a good job for that article.all calculation are already in article.so these tables should be updated within every match.so it's my responsibility for updating those tables in articles if you not want to do(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 06:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

You don't need to spend 1:30 hours. Just copy paste the table. And not all calculations are there. The Scorecards include only the highest runscorer and highest wickettaker in each match. So as a rule you should provide a source. And finally this is not IPL so don't try to make it like one. Human (talk) 06:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A Simple Human: I'm ready for providing a source,so restore the tables(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Not the one you provided follow the previous year's table. Don't add the highest score aggregate. Human (talk) 07:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A Simple Human: just restore them,then we will make changes(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 07:04, 12 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Note that this issue has also been raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket. My view is that the tables you currently have on the article page are essentially copied directly from CricInfo, but are older, out of date versions. Wouldn't it be much simpler to provide external links to those - and perhaps note any significant statistical achievements during the season in prose? Then at the end of the season a short prose summary and simpler tables can be used? The ones on this talk page strike me as far too complex - and if the tables you include simply copy from CricInfo then I have worries about plagiarism and NOTSTATS.
If you're looking to draw my attention to any messages on this page a ping is required - I will not read this page otherwise. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A Simple Human: I want to give a suggestion to you, next time when you remove 1000+ text bytes first you have to talk to person who has added bytes.i hope you understand my Points.dont delete bytes directly(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk))