Talk:2021 The Hundred season

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2021 The Hundred season article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cricket: Women's cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Women's cricket task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Women's sport: Cricket Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's cricket task force.

On 29 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to 2021 season of The Hundred. The result of the discussion was Moved to 2021 The Hundred season.

Split?[edit]

I realise that the men's and women's Hundreds are being given equal weight, but I think this article is too big to include both, and it's actually a little confusing for the article to refer to multiple teams by the same name when the results of the men's and women's matches have no effect on each other. They are separate competitions under the same banner. This article should be split into separate articles for the men's and women's tournaments. – Pee Jay 13:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The whole competition is pretty unified under one banner, one set of tickets, one set of broadcast rights, one set of branding, with the same fans supporting both teams. I completely agree that this article is a bit unwieldy but any split would essentially Wikipedia deciding that they're distinct competitions when that isn't the reality on the ground. Grvlx100 (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm, I wasn’t asking you to vote on this. Besides, splitting the content out doesn’t have any editorial implications. It’s a natural split to avoid making a single article too big and confusing. – Pee Jay 00:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm new to Wikipedia editing but everyone seems to be voting on things on Talk pages the whole time! It just seems like the wrong call to me, you were putting forward a proposition for discussion, no? Grvlx100 (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Typically, votes are frowned upon as Wikipedia is not a simple democracy. We make decisions based on arguments, not just a tally of supports versus opposes. I'm happy to discuss the situation though. Perhaps we should canvass for more opinions at WT:CRIC. – Pee Jay 14:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to "<YEAR> The Hundred season". Consensus on the alternate proposed name by Amakuru – robertsky (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– Revert undiscussed move. Also, the proposed names are more sensible, Wikipedia doesn't generally use (year) as a disambiguator, but instead uses the word season in sports articles, as we were doing before these undiscussed moves. Even though the current name is shorter, it doesn't comply with WP:CONSISTENT, as other cricket and sports articles use the season name. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nom, previous titles were more sensible. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - why not The Hundred 2021, etc. This is the format used on the template at the bottom of the page as well as in some of the sources. Bensci54 (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 2021 The Hundred season... per our usual naming format for season articles, e.g. 2021 NFL season. I see little reason to restore the weird long-winded "2021 season of The Hundred" formulation and not particularly keen on The Hundred 2021 either, unless that's a consitently used proper name. — Amakuru (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that's more common since these are definitely seasons and consistency applies for sure. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine by me too. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there have been a number of cut-and-paste moves and other moving of this article during the last couple of days. Anyone who wishes to discuss article names, please do so here and not by unilateral decision making. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.