Talk:24th Infantry Division (United States)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article24th Infantry Division (United States) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2009Good article nomineeListed
August 3, 2009WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 12, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
September 13, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

24th at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo?[edit]

The 24th was at Fort Wood wasn't it? My dad was stationed there as a 1st Sgt. in the early to mid '60's and he was in the 24th Div. If there is any info on this, please include it in the article. Thanks! Maltmomma (chat) 14:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the 24th ID did not see the Continental United States for the first time until 1970, when it rotated from Vietnam to Fort Riley, Kansas. More to the point, the Division was never stationed at Fort Leonard Wood. Your father may have been in the 24th ID while it was in Hawaii, Korea, or Vietnam, which is where they were prior to 1970, and he may have gone to Fort Leonard Wood for schooling, for a Temporary Duty Assignment, or as Cadre for a School there. SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 23:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To be a little more exact, not "rotated from Vietnam to Fort Riley, Kansas"; rather, see my site [24th Infantry Division in Europe 1958-1970]http://www.libraryautomation.com/24th/. The 24th Infantry Division was never in Vietnam, as made clear in the Cold War section of this article. User:Bob Rowen --Bobrowen (talk) 01:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq 1994[edit]

Are we sure that "In the fall of 1994 Iraq again menaced the Kuwaiti border"? I thought Iraq was well boxed in by UN sanctions after its Kuwait expedition. - Dave Smith 21:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:24th Infantry Division (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Review ongoing. There are a few points I feel could be improved prior to completing the GAR. I'll list a few thoughts below. SGGH ping! 20:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lead could use a slight copy edit. The opening sentence is a bit awkward to, perhaps with a more general opening line and the reactivation information in a second sentence.
  • It is a bit unclear as to which brigade and regiment we are talking about sometimes, and whether we are talking about units from within the 24th or from other units. As such, it is difficult to see what is relevant and what is overly detailed info about another Division's activities.
  • The image captions need a bit more than just what is in there, particularly "North Korean tanks advancing through Seoul, 1950." and "The Pusan Perimeter, August 1950" for example.
    • Added more to most of the captions. How does it look now? —Ed!(talk) 03:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • A copy edit is needed, in places, for example there is a full stop missing in "...surrounding and destroying elements of the US 2nd Infantry Division, 7th Infantry Division, and South Korean forces[50] The 24th Infantry Division, on the... " and the image caption "patch of the 187th Regimental Combat Team" needs a capital letter.
  • Is there a wikilink or two for the honors section? So we know what campaign streamers are?

So basically, a general copy edit, some image caption expansion and a slight reword in places. I'll keep watcing for these changes and complete the GAR. SGGH ping! 20:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do a more thorough copy-edit over the next day or so. Please let me know of anything major that I overlook. —Ed!(talk) 03:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have copy-edited the article, per your request. I believe I have addressed all of the issues you pointed out. —Ed!(talk) 03:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted the issues have been addressed. It is well written, informative, with good coverage. I am happy to rate this as a Good Article. Well done. SGGH ping! 10:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 24th Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 24th Infantry Division (United States)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "hersh":

  • From Battle of Rumaila: Hersh, Seymour M. "Annals of War: Overwhelming Force". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2013-12-21.
  • From Barry McCaffrey: Forbes, Daniel (May 15, 2000). "Gulf War crimes?". Salon.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]