Talk:324th Division (Vietnam)

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

What does the "B" mean?[edit]

The words "the letter B implies Bắc or North Vietnam" that User:Dino nam wishes to delete have been on the page since 2011 and while a CN tag is appropriate deletion at this point isn't. I am trying to locate an explanation as to why the Division was called 324B and what the B actually means, without success so far. An Osprey book suggests that the North Vietnamese cloned various Divisions, but there is no evidence that there was a 324A Division alongside a 324B Division, rather it seems that this was just done to confuse U.S. order of battle analysts, but that, at present, is OR Mztourist (talk) 06:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Posting here gives you no license to continue changing the article, mztourist. In fact, continuing to make this old man post "a la le small screen" may even be detrimental. Tread with care. Tiderolls 07:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am raising the issue as a topic for discussion and do not need your approval or warnings in doing so. It amuses me that you seem to find what I say so offensive. Mztourist (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]