Talk:3D Slash

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 19 March 2015 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Graphic design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

de-PROD[edit]

@Piotrus:, I have de-PRODed the article because I feel 3D-Slash meets the general notability guideline by having coverage in multiple reliable sources including [1][2][3]. In fairness, the notability is very borderline. It looks to be that Sylvain Huet is much more notable than his software [4]. If you don't object, I will reuse some of the material here in an article about him and redirect. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusB: Hmmm, I am not sure how reliable those sources are. Yes, the software received some niche coverage, but is it sufficient per WP:NSOFTWARE? But if you want to redirect it to a bio, we can review that separately. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I will work on the article repurpose within the next few days and ping you when ready. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]