Talk:4-metre band

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hello

Searching for "4 meter" eventually leads to a page called "4 metres". But wouldn't it be better to use as much ISO as possible, i.e. no plural and m or meter? (ISO31).

73 Bo, OZ2M

Using no plural may be correct as per ISO but it makes for abominable English grammar, Bo. It just sounds ugly.
As for the spelling 'meter' - from the manual of style. If an article's subject has a strong tie to a specific region/dialect, it should use that dialect. As the English speaking countries with majority of 4 metre operators (the UK and Ireland) spell the word 'metre', that's the spelling that should be used in the artcile.
Add redirects if you think it's an issue. I added metre redirects for all the HF ones.
73 - Gerry Lynch 20:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved the article to the American usage of spelling, but for a different reason: to keep it consistent with the spelling usage in the other ham bands (i.e. the others listed at Template:AmateurRadioBands-VHFUHF). I realize completely that this band is really only used in the UK and Europe, and Africa, so it would seem the manual of style would not be against using British spelling, however, this is not an entirely specific reason - it's not, say, Ham radio in the United Kingdom or something. Nonetheless, I would have used British spelling as you did.
However, I think it is more important to keeep the articles titles' dialects consistent. If you disagree then let's discuss it. --Jatkins (talk - contribs) 16:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Cleanup[edit]

There is way too much information in this article not to have it broken down into sections.--Kharker 19:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Gerry Lynch 20:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

red=allocation; blue=experimental

Hi, I started a map showing different regions where 4m band allocations exist. I'm not sure it is complete, so please let me know if there are any corrections to be made. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4-meter band. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 4-meter band. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

5 Meters[edit]

Did 5 meters become 4 meters in the U.K. like it became 6 meters in the U.S.?Stereorock (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 4-meter band. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:4-metre_band&oldid=1208666831"