Talk:45:33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Single?[edit]

I don't think this could realistically be described as a single, in that it's much longer than any chart company would consider a single, and it is priced the same as an album. I don't think album is the best description of the piece either, but it seems more accurate than single. Plum743 15:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


~ An LP, perhaps? wikiPEENdia! 10:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking of the same thing. I would say it's more of an album or an EP. I'll change it right now. Douglasr007 23:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this could accurately be described as dance-punk either. Dance Music or Work-Out Music is valid.

why not call it a concept album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.51.195 (talk) 00:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Influence[edit]

There's one part of this "song" that sounds exactly like the 2005 "The hand that feeds (DFA Remix)". Could be that included as an influence?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rooster alan (talkcontribs).

Yeah, the bassline of that remix sounds exactly like the first part of 45:33 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.136.203.223 (talkcontribs).

I would not called it "influence" but "re-use". As DFA Records is co-founded by James Murphy founder of LCD Soundsystem, I won't be surprised if one finds out that there is common material and common artist in both tracks. May 45:33 have some elements used before in the remix of The Hand That Feeds. Lacrymocéphale 16:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

45:33[edit]

Isn't 45 & 33 just the respective RPMs for albums and singles (vinyl)? There seems to be debate and various reasonings on the main page. 80.254.146.52 (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC) No idea what my account details are.[reply]