Talk:4: The Remix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article4: The Remix has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 28, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Why[edit]

Is the previous chronology a perfume and not 4. Aaron You Da One 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because Heat is a EP while 4 is not. Jivesh1205 (Talk)
How can a perfume be an EP? Aaron You Da One 22:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. Click on it. You will know how. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 09:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now it makes sense. It linked to the perfume before. Aaron You Da One 09:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Record date[edit]

"Recorded: 2009-11"?!! Isn't 2011-12 actually more correct? 109.10.33.64 (talk) 07:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:4: The Remix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomica (talk · contribs) 21:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links and dead references
  • End of Time redirects to The End of Time and Switch (DJ) to DJ Switch (however for the last I guess he is the same). — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No dead links. That's good. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox
  • Are you sure that all the songs were recorded in the period 2011-12? The 4 article says recording took place from 2009-2011? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why don't you add the producers in the infobox, instead of saying various? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • Prior to the release of the album ---> Is a extended play really an album? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rest is fine.— Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Background and development
  • The contest, which was opened to entrants in 25 countries ---> Maybe you can name some of the countries? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also with naming some countries, you can split the big sentence in 2 sentences? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe you can tell from which country was the winner? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Release and production
  • "The beat is great and I feel this mix would definitely get people moving in a club. It's got just enough attitude to get Beyonce fans moving." ---> I really think you can paraprase this ;) ! — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • the EP appeared ---> The EP debuted. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Track listing
  • Why don't you use this format? In that way you can also show which is the original producer. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Credits and personnel
Charts
Release history
  • No issues. 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
References

All in all, a very good written article. You can start resolving the issues now. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything  Done. My love is love (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All in all
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4: The Remix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]