Talk:4ZZZ

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal 4ZZZ is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

105% radio[edit]

Has anybody else noticed the following...

The station supports 30% Australian, 15% local content, 30% new releases and 30% female content.

...adds up to 105%? Uh... — Jeremy 08:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

105%[edit]

The "30% Australian, 15% local content, 30% new releases and 30% female content" overlaps - you can easily play a new-release by a local brisbane all-female group that covers Australian, Local, New Release and Female. Each quota is not mutually exclusive.

Ibbers (talk) 03:56, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Riot section[edit]

The reference linked for this section is borked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.218.13.195 (talk) 13:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4ZZZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007170115/http://www.acma.gov.au/WEBWR/_assets/main/LIB100052/lic031_community_radio_broadcasting_licences.pdf to http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib100052/lic031_community_radio_broadcasting_licences.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding 2015 winner of the Hot 100[edit]

Full disclaimed: I am a 4ZZZ announcer and have only recently taken interest in the Wikipedia page.

I tried to update the Hot 100 list to reflect the 2015 winner. However, there was an automated rejection of the edit. The song is titled 'Getting Shit For Free'. When I removed the word 'shit', the edit was allowed. So I'm assuming it was flagged as 'unconstructive' because of the word 'shit'. I am not sure how to contact any moderators in order to illustrate that the language is in context of the song title. When I followed the report link I went through 'report false negative' but I'm not sure whether or not that is the correct avenue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparklemotiondoubt (talk • contribs) 20:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just added shit and it seemed to have worked. Maybe something to do with your account being new. CrookedAsterisk (contribs • talk) 10:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]