Talk:4th United States Congress

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Untitled[edit]

This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
suggestions for future improvements:

supplemental Senate & House committees article
supplemental district maps article
narrative for major legislation
narrative for major events

stilltim 22:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The District numbering for Pennsylvania obviously makes no sense, even allowing for the 4th District electing two members. I have checked a number of entries in this series from 1789 to 1795 so far and have found a number of errors. I suggest someone start again using the Congressional Biographical Directory. Adam 06:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now corrected and verified stilltim 02:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NY Delegation[edit]

The listing for the New York delegation to the House of Representatives lists the party division as "5-4 Democratic-Republican". But underneath, there are ten representatives listed (six of them Democratic-Republican), not nine, and other sources I've checked indicate the apportionment for NY was ten. Was this a mistake, or are there special circumstances?AnneTG (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I'll fix. —GoldRingChip 01:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4th United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601025644/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]