Talk:522666/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --Gen. Quon (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No mention of production in lead

   "knowing that the group will ask him to consult on the case" Maybe re-word into "knowing that the group will ask for his assistance with the case"

   Maybe wikilink "agents" ala The X-Files in the plot section

   "Black and the FBI investigate the crime scene, where Black not only realises the bomber's proficiency with explosives, but is able to work out that he viewed the bombing from the parking garage." Change to "Black and the FBI investigate the crime scene; Black not only realises the bomber's proficiency with explosives, but is able to work out that he viewed the bombing from the parking garage."

   So I assume there are is Nielsen numbers available for this episode?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Surely there's some sort of picture out there? Maybe a screenshot?

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

On hold for 7 days to straighten the issues out.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

All the prose issues are taken care of. Maybe just a picture?--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Chased up a picture of Henrisken, though I'm probably going to fiddle with it a bit because it intrudes upon the next header by just a little bit in my browser. GRAPPLE X 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Switched it out for another one that's slightly broader and shorter, so it doesn't break headings any more. Thanks for taking the time over this one. GRAPPLE X 21:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Alright! Looks good, I pass!