Talk:56 Old Church Street

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Factual inaccuracy?[edit]

The passage "1815's Battle of Waterloo was planned in the garden." cannot be correct, as the Battle of Waterloo itself was not a planned enterprise by the allied powers of the time, but an attempted surprise attack by Napoleon. Although an overall strategy for the coming war may very well have been discussed at the location, it is not logically possible to word it as to the effect of 'the planning of Waterloo'.

The source given for the statement is an article from The Wall Street Journal, which is not an academic source. In addition the article is restricted for subscribers, which makes the source useless for the general public.

I therefore suggest that the abovementioned statement be removed. Marbjol (talk) 21:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]