Talk:7.35×51mm Carcano

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 7.35×51mm Carcano article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Untitled[edit]

Is there any definitive source on bore, groove, and bullet diameters, or rifling twist rate?

7.35mm suggests a nominal bore diameter of .289" and a nominal groove diameter of about .299" or .300", bullet diameter matching the groove diameter, probably with a relatively slow rifling twist, maybe 1:14" or thereabouts, for the bullet that was, even with its spitzer shape and aluminum nose filler, rather short and stubby for the caliber. All of this is, of course, guesswork. Does anyone actually know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:400:8000:A140:8099:9990:C5B1:3F22 (talk) 04:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]