Talk:86th Street station (BMT Fourth Avenue Line)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 86th Street (BMT Fourth Avenue Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:86th Street station (BMT Fourth Avenue Line)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1.02 editor (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Expect comments soon. 1.02 editor (T/C) 10:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • The lead needs to be longer. information on history and other relevant things should be included.
  • Do mention about the one stop southwards extension from this station, currently only the terminal is mentioned.
  • I see a mention that there was a renovation in the 1970s, but it is not covered in the article.
  • Reference needed for the second paragraph of Station layout
  • Is the bus stop part of the station? if it is not then it should not be covered in such great detail and the table should be excluded. If it is, do mention more about the bus station and include information about its history if different from the subway station.
    • The bus stops are just outside the station entrances. epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do ensure to update the article, as i see from the article that the renovations are expected to end soon.

Hold[edit]

I will be putting the article on hold for now. Do fix up the article, and i will go through it one more time before passing. Thanks 1.02 editor (T/C) 06:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC) @1.02 editor: Due to the Jewish holiday of Passover and the Sabbath on Saturday, I won't be editing from tonight until Saturday night at the earliest. I wanted to let you know to make sure that you know that I am still committed to addressing the aforementioned issues.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @1.02 editor: Due to Passover, I won't be able to do any editing from tonight until Thursday evening at the earliest. I am still committed to addressing your concerns with the article. Thanks for your patience and stay safe. I will do a similar rewrite to Bay Ridge Avenue to address the issues you brought up in the review. @Epicgenius: Thanks so much for helping out!--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kew Gardens 613, no problem. @1.02 editor: Can I ask that you defer making the decision about whether to promote all the 4th Avenue Line pages until Thursday at the earliest? I would like to nominate these all as part of a single DYK. epicgenius (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1.02 editor: All the issues mentioned have been dealt with.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, passing. 1.02 editor (T/C) 02:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)

Improved to Good Article status by Kew Gardens 613 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 01:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • A new hook is probably needed here as well as both hooks appear to have a limited audience and may not interest those who aren't from New York or aren't familiar with infrastructure (disclosure: I also discussed this with the nominator over at Discord, I'm leaving this comment here as well for transparency purposes). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds better, but unfortunately I may not have the time to be able to review both articles. Hopefully someone else can take a look here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC
  • Good articles. QPQ done. hook cited. Approving Alt2. --evrik (talk) 00:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:86th_Street_station_(BMT_Fourth_Avenue_Line)&oldid=1197104091"