Talk:885 series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

885 series forming basis for Class 395 and Hitachi Super Express?[edit]

A statement was recently added to this article indicating that the 885 series formed the basis for the UK Class 395 and later the Super Express train. The editor had included a reference citation to an article in the March issue of Modern Railways magazine (pages 30-31), but on actually checking the article, it is clear that the Japanese 885 series is not mentioned once. It only states that the Super Express is derived from the 395. No mention of the 885 at all. I have therefore removed this statement. --DAJF (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 885 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]