Talk:8x8

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by 118.1.188.70 (talk · contribs) on 17 August 2015 with the comment:
Non-notable company, most references are press releases
It was contested by Liberalartist (talk · contribs) on 2015-08-23 with the comment:
Seems likely that significant coverage in reliable secondary sources exists

request move[edit]

Title should be 8x8 Inc not 8x8 as 6x6 & 10x10 go to vehicle wheel/drive layouts. A link from 8x8 to here is appropriate.
This is especially important as the mobile page does not show the link to the wheel layout page

Alanthehat (talk) 07:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "Proposed deletion" tag[edit]

This article had been tagged for the Proposed deletion process "to suggest an article for uncontroversial deletion." I objected to the proposed deletion and have therefore removed the tag; I am posting here to explain my reasons for doing so.

I don't have any special expertise in VoIP or enterprise telecom. The basic reason for my objection is that tonight, when I kept coming across references to Packet8 in news articles about VoIP I was reading (e.g. [1]), I turned to Wikipedia to look for background information and came across this article for the first time. I was glad to find it here.

Now, I realize this isn't conclusive evidence of notability, and I could be persuaded to change my mind. However, a bit of preliminary searching in response to the proposed deletion tag has reinforced my initial impression that significant coverage in reliable secondary sources exists. The article certainly has room for improvement, but I don't think it merits deletion, and I certainly don't think it should be on any kind of a fast track for deletion.

LiberalArtist (talk) 04:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]