Talk:A. J. Allmendinger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move (2006)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

A.J. Allmendinger → A. J. Allmendinger – Naming conventions -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

  • Oppose: No refs in the article but the first 10 or so I found from Google all show A.J. - not a single A. J. I can't determine if A. and J. are his initials - not sure it would matter if I could. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

  • Not to discount Wknight94, but I went ahead and moved the page. Google searches are relevant to Wikipedia, but internal naming conventions matter more to the project. Teke (talk) 04:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Qualifying[edit]

This guy is now 0-5 in qualifying for Nextel Cup races, and I think TRB is 1-8 or something like that. At what point do we make metion of this?

At the conclusion of the season, if it has warranted comment from sound media sources. --Chr.K. 22:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move (2012)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Allmendinger → AJ Allmendinger – Allmendinger spells his (initialed) name without periods or spaces - just as "AJ" [1]. Other refs: [2] [3]. Of course a number of sources use "A.J." or "A. J." but it appears that "officially" it's "AJ". Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC) - The Bushranger One ping only 17:57, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Sorry but he's a race-car driver not a rapper. Silly spellings aren't a core part of race car categories. It should be written into WP:MOSPN that someone whose name is Anthony James has the initials A. J. unless they are unambiguously and consistently using it as a stagename per PJ Harvey (and that is not very encyclopaedic either) In ictu oculi (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally someone could launch a RM on A.J. Styles at the same time as this and try and add something about stylisms and initial spacings to WP:MOSPN Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies and/or WP:AT. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
...except we have him unambiguously and consistently using the name, and in reliable sources not directly associated with him too. If we decide "no, we'll not call you that, we'll call you this because Wikipedia says so'," that's WP:OR of the worst sort... - The Bushranger One ping only 06:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bushranger, it wouldn't be OR, since there's no pretence to research here. His own website clearly prefers "AJ" a styling which looks massively cooler than "A. J." and I don't blame him. It would simply be the imposition of encyclopaedic style over the personal styling of the subject of the article. It's fairly evident that the subject of the BLP wants his name to be cool as AJ. Great. But encyclopedias aren't cool, and this isn't a Yahoo sports page.

The title of an article should be based on the Article titles policy. The principal criteria are that a title be recognizable (as a name or description of the topic), natural, sufficiently precise, concise, and consistent with the titles of related articles. If these criteria are in conflict, they need to be balanced against one another.

All other A. J. [Smith] are at A. J. [Smith], except for A.J. Styles which should be. A brief look indicates all other drivers are at A. B. C. spacing too. But then again Britannica has PJ Harvey (groan). In ictu oculi (talk) 06:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But it's still "deviating from what the sources use, only because Wikipedia says so" - which just isn't kosher. The policy may be the policy, but that doesn't make it right. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why not, it's not as if these are serious sources. Has he appeared in the New York Times? If the New York Times breaks its MOS to make an exception then that'd be a different issue. As it stands A. J. while boring is consistent with a dozen other Category:NASCAR drivers articles, including a couple of other A. J.s. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still Oppose I searched NY Times and a truly reliable source has A. J. Allmendinger], no funny stylings. Sorry. If we were doing a sports website then fine. Of course I'm only one oppose. Surprised more NASCAR enthusiasts haven't commented. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The NY Times sometimes uses dots where many other sources don't, for instance "N.A.A.C.P."[4], although the organization's logo spells out "NAACP" without dots, as does naacp.org. Our article is at NAACP. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 07:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mmm, well as you know I'm not super-impressed with the NY Times either, but I'd imagine the NY Times doesn't drop dots for human names unless they are popstars. My main reservation is that this styling seems a bit flash for a NASCAR driver, which is hardly a scientific appraisal, but which the category bears out. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – how he styles his initials is irrelevant to WP style. Dicklyon (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • And having WP style deviate from the real world is uncyclopedic. It's not Wikipedia's place to tell someone how their name is styled. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - This page from NASCAR.COM has his name A.J. instead of AJ or A. J. It seems his name is different every website you go to. -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 22:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — We should give considerable weight to the way a person from the modern era writes their own name. Naturally, in centuries past there was little standardization or even consistency in spelling, and in many case traditional names like "Joan" of Arc took root in English even though that is not what she called herself; but that would rarely apply to people from the 20th century and later. In particular, we should try to avoid telling a living person that they don't know how to spell their own name. Of course we'd want to insist on a rendering in a Latinish alphabet, and there may be practical issues with rare Unicode characters that might not display for all readers (WGL-4 is a safe subset); or there might be some line of outrageousness that we don't want to cross... but mere omission of dots doesn't come close to crossing that line. I might have liked to see a bit firmer evidence (official websites are sometimes run by PR people without personal hands-on involvement from the celebrity), but this is probably good enough. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 22:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can sort of understand this, I suppose I should explain why my own view may seem to be inconsistent with Talk:John E. Márquez where weight has been given to his own office letterhead. In that case it's someone's national/ethnic identity (which can work the other way when someone wants to assimilate). I don't really see stylings of this sort "AJ for A. J." as of the same value as ethnic identity as an issue where respect for the individual's expression is automatically demanded :). Then again WP:STAGENAME does apply to Category:Pseudonymous rappers etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lead change[edit]

We may need to make a change in the lead here. Specifically the "Allmendinger currently drives the No. 22". I'm not sure, but the suspension over the failed drug test may end up lasting more than just the one race. For reference: http://www.nascar.com/news/120707/aallmendinger-suspended-substance-abuse-test/index.html — Ched :  ?  22:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. This has been listed for over a month, and consensus seems to still be in the air. If there's not consensus by now, there probably will not be (on this request) later. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 08:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


A. J. Allmendinger → AJ Allmendinger – Additional sources/evidience after 15 months since the last RM. As mentioned above, Allmendinger styles his name "AJ", not "A.J.", and has for some time; this would seem to fit WP:STAGENAME as a majority of sources follow his preferred styling. His official site uses "AJ", and in the last discussion it was said "If the New York Times breaks its MOS to make an exception then that'd be a different issue" - and here you go, New York Times using "AJ Allmendinger". Also USA Today, ESPN, Boston Globe, Fox Sports, Washington Times. Sources appear to be about 9-1 "AJ" over "A.J." and the only major source that uses "A.J." is Autoweek. --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 08:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC) - The Bushranger One ping only 19:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC) The Bushranger One ping only 19:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - Punctuation of English uses dots after first names, H. G. Wells. This still remains an issue of a typographic styling and MOS rather than an issue of substance. His real name is A. J. just as fellow Category:Racing drivers from California are P. J. Jones and J. R. Hildebrand etc. etc. Newspapers aren't consistent; e.g. USA Today has "JR Hildebrand" for J. R. Hildebrand, but then USAToday A.J. Allmendinger). We need evidence such as an article "AJ Allmendinger and J. R. Hildebrand are.." to see a real substantial difference rather than random variation between different drivers and different journalist's ideas about punctuation. In ictu oculi (talk)
  • Support Usage in reliable sources is clear, and it aligns with the subject's preference. Linguistic prescriptivism aside, periods and spaces are completely unnecessary to meaning. Whether I write J. R. R. Tolkien, J.R.R. Tolkien, or JRR Tolkien, you know exactly what I mean. --BDD (talk) 23:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - BDD is correct that is doesn't really materially affect the reading of the article, but then neither do many of the rules in WP:MOS. However, that does not mean the goal of achieving consistency across articles is a worthless one. Per In ictu oculi, I think that if most articles use periods after initials then we should do the same here, even if the subject himself does have an explicit preference.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • In that case it's "imposing a standard on Wikipedia that does not reflect useage in the real world" - which is a form of WP:OR, and in this case could be argued to be a violation of not just WP:COMMONNAME but also WP:BLP. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This proposal is consistent with other instances where personal names are given leeway to vary from convention (for example, AJ Dee, AJ Jenks, AJ Leitch-Smith, AJ Odudu, JD Davis, JJ Appleton, and PK Dwyer being unpunctuated, and k.d. lang and bell hooks using lowercase letters). bd2412 T 13:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is clearly the more common form in the sources. The house style doesn't give us license to force a form that's uncommon in the sources.--Cúchullain t/c 14:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Three out of four external links use "A.J." and the fourth (the official site) is "under construction" and so provides no guidance. The claim of "common name" is unconvincing and there is insufficient grounds to depart from our house style. DrKiernan (talk) 18:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Three out of four external links...that date to before the change in his preferred name. The New York Times and USA Today use "AJ", using a "house style" is flat-out unencylopedic when the person themself and major sources differ from it. Wikipedia is supposed to reflect sources, not make up its own "house style". - The Bushranger One ping only
      • Sources use "A.J.", as shown. We're not making anything up. DrKiernan (talk) 19:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • Old sources. The vast majority of current sources use "AJ". And I was referring to the "house style" as a whole which is a plague across a variety of projects (particulary album and song titles), not just here. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A. J. Allmendinger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indy links[edit]

Possible future sources for expansion on his IndyCar career: 1, 2, 3 --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:A._J._Allmendinger&oldid=1197126481"