Talk:A0620-00

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CalRis (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC): I suggest removing the "candidate black hole"-status of A0620-00 and label the dark object as a confirmed black hole. Reason: J. Casares and P.G. Jonker collect in their 2013-Paper Mass Measurements of Stellar and Intermediate-Mass Black-Holes mass measurements for various black hole x-ray transients, among them A0620-00. The minimal masses from various papers are given as 7.3, 4.1, 5, 3.3, 11.0, and 6.6. Casares/Jonker recommend the value of 6.6 (± 0.3) as the likeliest value. These values are all above the upper masses of neutron stars as defined by the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit. And although that upper limit is not exactly known, the masses given are all well above that limit. The only outlier is the mass of 3.3, but that one is the lower limit of a mass estimate of 3.3−13.6 solar masses. Also Kuulkers et al. call A0620-00 in their 2013-paper MAXI J1659-152: The shortest orbital period black-hole transient in outburst A0620-00 the very first transient source with a confirmed black hole. Bye, CalRis.[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A0620-00. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in A0620-00[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of A0620-00's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Simbad":

  • From 20 Monocerotis: "20 Mon". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2019-05-31.
  • From 19 Monocerotis: "19 Mon". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
  • From 18 Monocerotis: "18 Mon". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2019-05-30.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name 1A 0620-00 vs A0620-00[edit]

Can somebody tell me where does the name "1A 0620-00" come from? What does "1A" mean? What does "0620-00" mean? Why is it abbreviated "A0620-00"? Why choose the abbreviated name as wiki title (French wiki does not do that)? Thanks. I'll let whatever bot sign for me.