Talk:A2 (Croatia)

A2 (Croatia) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 2, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 5, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the cost of the final 20-kilometre (12 mi) segment of the Croatian A2 motorway was twice that of the other two-thirds of the route?

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Europe Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European Highways Task Force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by slon02, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on July 27, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:A2 (Croatia)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 01:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Can some information about the planning of A2 be added to the history? Also, can the letter classification of the rest areas be added to the table?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a couple of concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 01:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and comments. I have already added a paragraph on planning of the route to the history section. As far as letter codes assigned to the rest areas are concerned, adding them to the table should not be a problem, however I am concerned that without a source specifying letter designations with specific rest area names, this would constitute WP:SYNTH. I have added this column to the table but as I'm unsure about this issue, I'd like to have your feedback on this.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any harm with adding the letters as such, as the source for the letter designation just verifies that the specific letter is used for that type of rest area based on the description. The article looks good now so I will pass it. Dough 48 72 17:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]