Talk:ACM Transactions on Graphics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ACM Transactions on Graphics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

I think the impact section should be removed. First of all, it was never clear in the literature how to accurately measure the impact of a journal or a conference. Secondly, this specific ranking from citeseer seems very inaccurate. According to the referenced site [3], "this list is automatically generated and may contain errors" (and is also stopped generating in May 2003). Siggraph is now incorporated into TOG, thus this ranking does not hold anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.71.197 (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the impact section as suggested; replaced with a brief mention of a more up-to-date ranking. — Miym (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]