Talk:ATLAS.ti

Sources

The article current has no sources for its assertions of being significant. I previously suggested it be deleted, but someone contested that and provided this link:

• http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/3/4.html

How best to include that? — Saxifrage ✎ 20:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Shrink

It might be useful to shrink this article down to a commented link within a to-be article "qualitative data analysis" (which I consider to stub-start..). There are several qda software tools out there of which I found the one in question here to be of rather bewildering ilk, to say the least. Information on qda tools still seems sparse or product-biased respectively (such a piece of text-organization software is not exactly rocket science, anyway). Daphe (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Advertisement

An anonymous editor, possibly an employee of Atlas.ti, insists on replacing the content of this article with what appears to be a standard marketing brochure. While the software itself is somewhat notable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for product advertising. Please see WP:COI and WP:SPAM for more information. --Alan Au 20:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I think it's useful to have a very brief entry to explain what Atlas.ti is, but the current entry reads exactly like marketing text -- it clearly violates Wikipedia's requirement for neutral point of view. In addition, the text as written does not answer the basic question I had in accessing this article -- when you use Atlas.ti, do you create a database? So the marketing text itself isn't even very well conceived.

I see that the question of whether this is an encyclopedia article or a marketing brochure has persisted for more than a year. Maybe it's time for Wikipedia to crack down on corporate shills? Thuvan Dihn (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Logo

The logo used in this article is likely fine to use under fair use, but it lacks source information. I've tagged the image's description page. The uploader is permanently blocked, so useful information is unlikely to be forthcoming from that direction. — Saxifrage ✎ 03:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

References

Not got time myself, but here's some free access papers on functionality if you want a paper reference:

http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/QUICworkingpapers.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.12.238 (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

"Atlas.ti" or "ATLAS.ti"?

Should it be "Atlas.ti" or "ATLAS.ti"? The title of the article is out of sync with the rest. --Mortense (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)