Talk:A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 2 March 2018[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested, making no judgments regarding notability. Dekimasuよ! 08:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver (album by Eduardo) → A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver – Article title is salted due to numerous recreations and AfD, would now fall under WP:ATDAB #1. Album's artist now appears to have an article which may pass GNG, although previously it has been deleted/redirected via AfD. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Loriendrew: The AfD is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Correct, I placed the old-afd template above (although a different name it is the same subject.) My move request is not based on content, just the Title and Dab policies. I would move it myself but the location is locked, hence the move request.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support. The opposition should had been through AFD. I don't see WP:N issues a priori. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
About the previous AfD[edit]
Admin comment: This article now appears to be sufficiently different from the previously deleted version that I believe it does not qualify for G4 speedy deletion; it could be deleted via a new AfD. I do not have any opinion on whether or not this article meets WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. --MelanieN (talk) 23:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)