Talk:A Lyga

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

TV Coverage[edit]

Is there any tv companies that cover the A Lyga?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.240.89.39 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2007

Spectator data[edit]

@Sir Sputnik: Spectator data is pretty accurate, if you have other sources please correct and update, don't just negate other users work with some blunt generalization that one particular source is not reliable.Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfmartyn: Since much of transfermarkt's content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is a self-published and therefore unreliable source. It should not be cited. As such, the attendence figures are unverified, and should not be readded without including a reliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Sputnik: Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope of bringing in bias and profiling, just like you did now - first shoot/delete then question. Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Yes: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope Some sources are more reliable than others, it's a fundamental principle of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. And per WP:FOOTY consensus (see Wikipedia:Consensus), Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link to most recent Transfermarkt discussion: WP:TRANSFERMARKT. And we only include reliable sources, which means they have to demonstrate a level of fact-checking which Transfermarkt does not, because it's a user-generated site. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]