Talk:A Place with No Name/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I was a little worried about some of the prose, but I see that some recent ungrammatical additions have been removed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references check out OK
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Not applicable, no images used
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Although brief, this article is concise, well written, sourced and focussed. It provides an interesting addition to information about Jackson. I have no hesitation in passing it as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]