Talk:A Toast to Men/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 08:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • a song from American singer → I think "by" sounds better here
  • you should say here, as well as in the "Background" section that it fatured vocals from Lady Mary

Infobox[edit]

  • flawless ;)

Background and composition[edit]

  • behind the lyrics, she said → say "confessed" here to avoid word repetition
  • and twelve seconds → 12 is above 10, so don't spell it out

Release and promotion[edit]

  • was released as a digital download → replace "as a" with "for"
  • The song was promoted → state "the track" here to avoid repeition
  • sometime in the mid-2000s → this sounds very weird; if you don't have the exact date, I suggest removing this
  • of IGN, the record was → "record" is generally only used for albums, so state "recording" here

Reception[edit]

  • and "add[ed[ fuel → syntax error
  • You can link the first paragraph with the second one if you like
  • I would prefer to keep it separate as the first paragraph is covering the critical reception while the second one is covering commercial performance. Aoba47 (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formats and track listings[edit]

  • You can remove "Formats and" to keep the section name simple
  • EP → Digital EP
  • If you look at the Amazon.com reference, then you will see that there was a CD single for the EP so "Digital EP" would not be an accurate title. Aoba47 (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel[edit]

  • flawless ;)

Charts[edit]

  • I fixed the table here

Release history[edit]

  • Fixed things here as well
  • Unlink formats please

Other stuff[edit]

Copy-violation[edit]

  • 47.9%; maybe you can reword some things?
  • Revised. Thank you for pointing this out. Hopefully this fixes it. Aoba47 (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

References[edit]

  • As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
  • No dead links! Good job!

Outcome[edit]

Putting this  On hold for 7 days. Great job with the article; Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the review. I will make the corrections on Monday if that is okay with you as I have a busy weekend. Aoba47 (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cartoon network freak: Thank you for your review. I believe that I have covered all of the points raised above. Let me know if there is anything else that I can do to improve the article. Thank you again. Aoba47 (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.