Talk:Abish (Book of Mormon)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Section header[edit]

Currently, the one section header is "History", which carries with it the implication that this story, is, well, history. While there may be folks who feel that the Book of Mormon is a source of accurate historical information, this is not the more common view among historians; speaking as if this is history is not neutral point of view. We don't need to find a title that requires the view that this is fiction (i.e., the standard "Fictional character biography" section which one finds on characters from literature), something that is neutral on whether the the material is historical or imaginary should be fine, in context. Suggestions? --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 23:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by P-Makoto (talk). Self-nominated at 02:09, 19 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Expanded more than five times in the last couple of days, looks neutral and is sourced. One of the sources is an MA thesis, which is not optimal per WP:SCHOLARSHIP, but it's mostly just used for quotations from others and shouldn't be a serious issue. No copyright problems as far as I can see, Earwig only shows a few quotations. All three hooks look good and are sourced in the article. QPQ done. Nice article and well done. Ffranc (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]