Talk:Abney effect

Color Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diagram[edit]

Any comments on this diagram? Does it illustrate the effect? Are there any good references/sources for illustrating this effect that anyone can recommend? thanks, pfctdayelise (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like more of a demonstration of blown out highlights to me. ie. these colours ACTUALLY DO have different hues. --GregE (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether it illustrates the effect or not -- the questions are whether the pairs on the left side both have the same hue, and whether the color being added at each step is white (or rather gray). The latter point is particularly of concern, since "white" is a somewhat arbitrary concept and may differ across monitors. One way or another, I think the final version would illustrate the effect as well as the animation, and would be preferable. (Personal opinion: I HATE animations that I can't turn off, as they are a constant drain on my attention.) Regards, Looie496 (talk) 19:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I solved the mystery of the diagram. One starts with the leftmost color, and each progression to the right averages each of the three RGB values with 255 (of white). This is unfortunately wrong: sRGB is gamma-corrected so direct averaging would not reflect a physical blending of light. --Artoria2e5 🌉 06:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no idea how to fix it yet. The best way should be regenerating the entire image, maybe making it not an animation this time. But writing code for image generation? Oh no. --Artoria 2e5 🌉 06:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abney effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612173024/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5438649.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5438649.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]