Talk:Academic Hall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this be on the National Register of Historic Places category?[edit]

The is an interesting quandry. This building burned more than 100 years ago and the only remnant are the columns (which of course are among the most recognizable landmarks in the state). The Francis Quadrangle which includes the columns is on the Register. For what it's worth the official applications for National Register in Boone County is http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/Boone.htm My knee jerk interpretation is that it should be knocked off but I would curious to hear other opinions.Americasroof (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, the columns are listed as a contributing structure to the historic district. My instinct would be to include it as part of the district since there is not another page for the columns. Also, for instance, Jesse Hall is not on the register itself, but is listed as a contributing building, of course Jesse is much more historic and notable than many a building on the register. I really have no strong opinion on the category though. Grey Wanderer (talk) 04:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a strong opinion either. I posted the question on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places more than two weeks ago. The only response so far is from HornofColumbia which noted the Columns red link on the Francis Quadrangle article should redirect to Academic Hall.Americasroof (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I replied just now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Question about destroyed building where the ruins are on the register. --doncram (talk) 08:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academic Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]