Talk:ActionShot

this is work in progress -- please don't delete this

It is considered Highly inappropriate to remove PROD templates without a reason. In fact, it can result in a ban. --King Öomie 15:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am really sorry to remove the PROD -- i am a new user and i am try to describe some intresting issue. Now i am more familiar with Wiki requirements and i ma try to satisfy them. I am continue to edit this page, is it possible to postpone this delition. I am going to describe extention techniqies of Panoramic photography. But it is very complicate and requires some time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okseduard (talk • contribs) 15:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Prod counts down seven days, so you have a week. If it looks like there's significant progress on the article at that time, it'll be extended (or simply removed). --King Öomie 15:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I also will appresiate any of your assitance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okseduard (talk • contribs) 15:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can i remove the PROD now -- because i continue to change this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okseduard (talk • contribs) 16:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The ActionShot is not minor Samsung feature. It is new approach in panoramic photography where instead of capturing static panoramic image user want to capture dynamic image of moving object -- is it possible to add to Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okseduard (talk • contribs) 16:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. I'll ask Favonian (who originally placed the prod) what he thinks. --King Öomie 15:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's in agreement. I'll remove the prod. --King Öomie 16:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. And you are wellcome to continue to add your comment and remarks that i found very useful.--Okseduard (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added reference to some comercial product that makes such photos automatically. Is it allowed?--Okseduard (talk) 17:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To my opinion it is time to remove the notability, tone and unreferenced, as there are good references now, and inappropriate parts were removed. Please comment before removing them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noso1 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will remove the notability, tone and unreferenced --ActionMaverick (talk) 07:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ActionShot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]