Talk:Adblock Plus/Archives/2014
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Funding of Adblock Plus by Google in order to white list their ads seems noteworthy but not mentioned. 50.144.0.3 (talk) 21:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- source? Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 06:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
See Also - Dec. 2013
Created a "See Also" subsection for the article, mirrored on the similar section in the AdBlock article, but with links to:
What other wikilinks do ppl think would be appropriate for inclusion in this see also section? Thanks. joepaT 06:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- They seem appropriate, I think. Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 06:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Removal of information by ip
this ip edit removed some information claiming it's incorrect. I'm not sure whether it's vandalism or not. Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 06:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Legality of Adblocking
is adblocking legal? it doesn't mention in he article. Twipley (talk) 01:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- well, i guess that's legal, since it's still alive. Twipley (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- It is very much legal In every jurisdiction I can think of. Blocking requests is any user's right and is simply good security. 74.197.27.85 (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's a very sad reflection of a commercialized society that you think doing something on your own computer to hide ads from yourself might somehow be criminal. It's up to you what you want to read and look at. I hope you don't feel guilty if you get up to use the toilet during a commercial break on television! Credulity (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Of course it is legal. It compares to taking a pair of siccors and cutting out ads from a newspaper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.162.73.46 (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)