Talk:Admiral-class battlecruiser/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
There's something wrong with the reference to the Mackensens; do you mean the Ersatz Yorcks? The Mackensens had 35cm guns, not 38s.
That's what Brit Intelligence was reporting at the time; I've clarified it through a note.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, but you might also want to mention that Germany was in fact building four Mackensens, not three. Parsecboy (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
One other thing: the external link doesn't seem to be working. Other than that everything looks pretty good. Just fix the bit about the Mackensens/Ersatz Yorcks and this article will be ready for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the link.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]