Talk:Aeroelasticity

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Examples[edit]

Are these examples in aircraft? http://youtube.com/watch?v=zh2_vGYWO8s and http://youtube.com/watch?v=ORjbMRNyGnE

No, it's not aerodynamic forces causing those vibrations, it's probably imbalance in the rotor. But they're good examples of resonance because unless you're near the resonant frequency an imbalance vibration probably won't grow like that... --Sukisuki (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taking aeroelasticity to use[edit]

There has been at least one promising attempt to generate electrical wind power utilizing the aeroelastic properties of a taut membrane (belt). [1] - Soulkeeper 14:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a Google tech talk, and a website by the same guy [2], [3], I think it's worth mentioning that flutter isn't always a destructive force. I'll put a link to it in the article. --Sukisuki (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Media??[edit]

Does this "Activ Aeroelastic Wing" have anything to do with aeroelasticity as covered by this article? As far as I can make out it is a self-flexing wing. AlekH (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is this not a form of resonance?[edit]

Wikipedia claims that the Tacoma narrows bridge was not destroyed by resonance, but instead by aeroelastic flutter.

It then writes that "Flutter is a self-feeding and potentially destructive vibration where aerodynamic forces on an object couple with a structure's natural mode of vibration to produce rapid periodic motion. ... a positive feedback occurs between the structure's natural vibration and the aerodynamic forces. That is, that the vibrational movement of the object increases an aerodynamic load which in turn drives the object to move further. "

Um, isn't that one of the very definitions of resonance? 71.161.65.54 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Resonance is the amplification of the vibration amplitudes due to the tuning process of the excitation force frequency content to the natural frequencies of the excited structure. Any amount of damping present in the structure (and it is always present) limits the amplitudes of vibration due to resonance, although these limits can lie beyond the structural strength levels. Flutter is an instability, i.e., the free response of the structure when exposed to air flow increases indefinitely because of the coupling of inertial, aerodynamic and elastic forces. Actually, the three components act as if the structure had negative damping, absorbing energy from the airstream, not dissipating it. Therefore, flutter is not resonance, it is an instability. Instabilities are not seen in structures, but are common in the design of automatic controlers, and that is why it is called a feedback process. The air flow works as a control law that leads to unstable responses when the system's gain is very high, and in aeroelasticity the gain is the air speed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.7.145.1 (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, isn't that one of the very definitions of resonance?

Or can you make any difference clear ?

--195.137.93.171 (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added this to Kármán_vortex_street#See_also

Aeroelastic Flutter - where the self-resonance of the solid object dominates, eg flapping to give +/- Lift (force) resulting from angle of attack

No ? --195.137.93.171 (talk) 00:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking this way: The bridge could be still in a flow, and a simple gust or touch would destabilize it, should the flow speed been greater than the flutter speed. Ressonance would imply an external force. It's is clear once you have seen the equations of motion for such a system. They are avaiable in the books in the Reference section (Bisplinghoff, Hodges, Fung). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.252.129.42 (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

paper balls with opening[edit]

cheap toy in Japan with about 12 cm in diameter, the hole about 8 mm, to be bridged and smashed like a volleyball AND stays pretty filled with air. --Helium4 (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aeroelasticity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811003313/http://www.nlr.nl:80/smartsite.dws?l=en&id=9041 to http://www.nlr.nl/smartsite.dws?l=en&id=9041

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flutter pop up text in other articles points to the subject header Dynamic Aeroelasticity[edit]

When you hover over flutter in a linked page, it displays "Dynamic aeroelasticity studies the interactions among aerodynamic..." instead of "Flutter is a dynamic instability of an elastic structure..." I normally just correct spelling and grammar, and after going through help pages my head is spinning, the task is far beyond me to fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr71fan (talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]