Talk:African swine fever virus

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses High‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture: Livestock High‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as High-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

History[edit]

I think reference 13, Radford, Ben (April 29, 2009). "Blowback? SF Chronicle: CIA Introduced Swine Flu in Cuba to Weaken Castro" should be deleted. The writer of that article, "a scientific paranormal investigator" cites 3 paragraphs from "a San Francisco alternative news site" that seems to think African Swine Fever and Swine Influenza are the same disease (and presumably caused by the same virus?). That's ridiculous, as any virologist could confirm. Terrycojones (talk) 11:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, and have belatedly removed it. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on African swine fever virus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110122135028/http://www.inspection.gc.ca:80/english/anima/disemala/africporc/africporcfse.shtml to http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/disemala/africporc/africporcfse.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on African swine fever virus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting into virus and disease articles[edit]

Currently this article about virus has a lot of disease information which is not very typical to have in a virology article. I think it is better to have a separate African swine fever article where things like signs and symptoms, history of disease and measures of prevention and disease management strategies are described. As a very close example, see how Classical swine fever is a separate article. In many other language versions of Wikipedia, article for disease exists, unlike in English Wikipedia, where it is just a redirect. I actually was bold to start the split, but it got reverted (see discussion here). If there are any objections for this split, please post your opinion here. --Sspeik (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

China interception[edit]

US customs intercepted 1 million pounds of pork being smuggled in from China.[1] The pork will supposedly be incinerated. The news report doesn't say anything definite about testing it for the virus. I leave it to others to decide whether to put this in the article, watch for further developments, or whatever. 173.228.123.166 (talk) 07:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given the intention to incinerate it, I doubt it will be tested for anything and that it is assumed to have, potentially, everything.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Economic consequences of 2018[edit]

An unreferenced note I read says that hundreds of millions (40%) of pigs were slaughtered in China in 2018. The unsatisfied Chinese demand caused an increase of prices worldwide. China turned to chicken and stopped importing soy and cereal for forage, altering world markets. If you can reference it properly, it would be an important addition to the article. --Error (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]