Talk:After Tiller

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

POV[edit]

This article indicates universal praise from critics and completely ignores the firestorm of condemnation from the conservative press. --BenMcLean (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then what is the "firestorm of condemnation"? Are they Reliable Sources? Could you provide the links here. Cap020570 (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not quote the response from the liberal press, instead choosing (rightly) to describe the responses of film critics to the film as a film. Why do you think it should contain the response from the conservative press? Contrary to the delusions of various figures, including some in the more clueless reaches of the mainstream menu, a neutral point of view and balanced reporting does not mean that one must go out of the way to find people who hate something, if you are accurately reporting that many people like something. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless, there were 6% of negative reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Some converse opinions are probably needed in the Reception section, perhaps Keith Uhlich's writeup in Time Out or Mike D'Angelo's review from the A.V. Club. I'll probably exchange them for Lemire's RogerEbert.com review and that of the New York Post (the section is overly long, anyway) in a few hours and remove the neutrality banner if there are no objections.Jg2904 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on After Tiller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]