Talk:Against a Dark Background

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I'd like to split off the Lazy Gun stuff back into its own article. It's fascinating, but I feel too detailed for a book article. Guinnog 00:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Culture[edit]

Is there any hidden connection to the Culture as there is with Inversions? (I could not spot one with either but there apparently is with the latter.)--Lucifer 15:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, I don't think there is one (but am all-ears in case there is!). As I recall, AaDB is set far outside a galaxy, hence the civilisation's isolation. I'm pretty sure the galaxy isn't specifically identified as our's (unlike in Culture stories). A Google search should turn something up. Just need to avoid fancruft. Cheers, --Plumbago 16:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lucifer 11:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with "Lazy Gun"[edit]

Since the Lazy Gun is a fictional object, and exists only within this single story, I agree that its article should be merged with this one, as a sub-section. Efalk (talk) 13:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Confuseatron (talk) 00:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds Reasonable. Corhen (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, merge with a redirect. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 16:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --John (talk) 08:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links[edit]

I can't find the pages linked to any of the footnotes. I'll see if I can find suitable replacements if/when I get a Round Tuit. Isambardcat (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Major spoiler[edit]

There is a major give-away in the first paragraph: the meaning of the novel's title. It has no place in a synopsis. I am removing it. Yunuswesley (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]