Talk:Agnico Eagle

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requesting the name change of the Agnico-Eagle Mining page to remove the hyphen[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agnico-Eagle Mines → Agnico Eagle Mines Limited – The company has re-branded themselves and their corporate name no longer includes the hyphen between the “Agnico” and “Eagle”. More information and further explanation about the new name is shown on their website here at http://www.agnicoeagle.com/en/About-Us/Pages/Our-Evolving-Identity.aspx.--Relisted. jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Mc.coffin17 (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

Mc.coffin17 (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Neutrality[edit]

A substantial part of this article is PR for the company. Calling its founder a "visionary" is one thing, lapsing into the first person plural is another - this article at one point refers to the company's mining rights as "our resources". Last I checked, "we" don't own Agnico Eagle Mines, so I don't think the company's resources are "ours" in any way. I won't edit it though; it's a great indicator of this article's bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apex Editor (talk • contribs) 22:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Language[edit]

"Agnico Eagle has full exposure to higher gold prices consistent with its policy of no-forward gold sales."

Is this vague and incredibly technical language really appropriate for an article's lede, especially given there is no further explanation anywhere in the body of the article? Illini407^talk 20:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]