Talk:Air-Rail Link

Siemens involvement

Press release[1] from Siemens stating that they supplied the electrical system for this and some of the other DCC systems. —Sladen (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Replacement

The fourth paragraph of this section has a sentence beginning "The trains operate at a minimum headway is 120 seconds, ...". This is clearly wrong and I would have corrected it but I don't know what it should say. Possibly it should be "of" 120 seconds rather than "is", but that still makes no sense to me. Can anyone correct this? Fredsie (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Maglev cars.

Pretty sure there were (are?) three not two, but cannot find any source. I have clear memories of riding the line when it was operating with a single-car train on one track, and a two-car train on the other. And there seem to be three cars around until recently (one at the NRM, one at Peterborough, and the one that got auctioned on ebay). Can anybody shed (and source) any light?. -- Starbois (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

One in peterborough at rail world? http://www.railworld.net/birminghammaglev.php 81.155.210.202 (talk) 11:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

gliding hight

The article says: «altitude of 15 millimetres (0.59 in)» I can see at least two gross mistakes here. Tuvalkin (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Monorail

The first paragraph of the first external link (the airport's official website) describes this as a monorail. The Wikipedia article doesn't categorize this as a monorail, but there is no information about how many wheels/rails it does have. Is it a monorail in any sense? If so that should be made clear. And does the request button really say "demand"?--Shantavira|^{feed me} 16:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AirRail Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522011843/http://www.birminghammail.net/news/solihull-news/tm_objectid%3D17662730%26method%3Dfull%26siteid%3D50002%26headline%3Dnew-plan-aims-to-bring-the-maglev-back-name_page.html to http://www.birminghammail.net/news/solihull-news/tm_objectid%3D17662730%26method%3Dfull%26siteid%3D50002%26headline%3Dnew-plan-aims-to-bring-the-maglev-back-name_page.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129092006/http://www.arup.com/rail/project.cfm?pageid=2529 to http://www.arup.com/rail/project.cfm?pageid=2529
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090707103209/http://www.birminghamairport.co.uk/showpage.aspx?id=175 to http://www.birminghamairport.co.uk/showpage.aspx?id=175

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)