Talk:Air Pegasus

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Defunct?[edit]

Should we convert the article to past tense? It has been two months since they suspended operations, and the last news articles on the airline were published over a month ago. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 15:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging recent editors @LeoFrank, @Adixit, @Trinidade, @Magentic Manifestations

There aren't any official announcements on the resumption of flights. Given that all the aircraft of the airline have been de-registered, it might be a while since the resumption, if any, becomes a reality. It's best to put this in the past tense. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, makes sense to put the article in past tense. Trinidade (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is important to note this sentence in the History section: "Air Pegasus has agreed to pay back 50% of its dues to the lessors and will pay the remaining in instalments once flights resume." (source) We don't know the current status of this deal, but it may be good to wait another month or two for new information. I feel that sentence would seem out of place if the article were in past tense now. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 22:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We can mention the same with the date of the news and convert the article to past tense.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, also with the recent news that the DGCA has deregistered all the airline's aircraft, it is best to put the article in past tense. I have done so now. Thanks for everyone's input. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 00:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't an airline become defunct only when the license is suspended permanently? As long as the licence is alive, they can start at any time. Amdmustafa (talk) 04:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, although it'll probably be suspended soon. I put the article back in present tense. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 02:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]