Talk:Airhitch

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Are there some more sources out there? I still have my doubts about this system. It looks too much like a hoax for me. But I hope I'm wrong... Guaka 15:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found two interesting links, though I wonder if they can be put in the article these days (Wikipedia being a serious encyclopedia and such):

Some comments on a blog
The downside of using airhitch at digihitch.com

Guaka 15:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings: After doing a google search, these are some comments for Airhitch users. I have failed to find even one positive review of Airhitch.

http://www.gridskipper.com/travel/flights/airhitch-bitchfest-127802.php http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/alternative_travel/49104 http://messages.travel.yahoo.com/travel/international/France/threadview?bn=TRA-191501740-paris&tid=568&mid=568&tof=16&m=tm&rt=2 http://blather.typepad.com/badadvice/2006/05/thanks_for_call.html http://www.bug.co.uk/forums/archive/index.php/t-671.html http://boards.bootsnall.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/307095755/m/44700045316

I have spent some time in their AIM chat room, which is the only way Aithitch deals with people, and have seen them abuse a lot of people. Airhitch abuses people into giving them a $29 "backout donation" so they are able to raise money without doing any work. For the people who put up with their abuse and continue with the system, I did see them eventually guide people to a regular airline's website to book the fare. They also require you to do vast searches and come up with a price to base your extra donation off of. It is 10% of the amount saved.

They did not, at any time, offer anyone the chance to "hitchhike" on a commercial airplane as 99% of their website talks about. And I also saw that their trainees do most of the actual work to help people find flights. It seems that staff is there only to scam you for a donation. Long story short, only go to Airhitch if you have lots of time to spend (several days) and you have no other options. One last tip would be to message the trainees...they are more helpful than the staff. This organization is almost more of scam than anything else 62.168.254.226 08:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

STAY AWAY. If you want to try something similar, try Airtech.com which I have used in the past successfully. Stay far away from airhitch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.247.234 (talk) 08:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airhitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060507230830/http://www.digihitch.com/article788.html to http://www.digihitch.com/article788.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Airhitch®" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Airhitch® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 2#Airhitch® until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]