Talk:Akbar Shah (diamond)

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gemology and Jewelry Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Origin of the diamond[edit]

It seems unlikely that this account from the Tuzuk-i Jahangiri refers to the Akbar Shah, since the two inscriptions that were on the stone read 'Shah Akbar the Shah of the World 1028' and 'To the Lord of two Worlds Shah Jahan 1039'. If the stone had been given to the Emperor between these two (Jahangir), then why did it bear his father's name and his son's name? It is more likely to have been a possession of the Emperor Akbar, and the account in the Tuzuk-i Jahangiri would be of so significance. (The Hijri dates correspond to AD 1618 1nd AD 1629.) Ducky59 (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Akbar Shah (diamond). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140128033326/http://www.farlang.com/diamonds/streeter_great_diamonds/page_200 to http://www.farlang.com/diamonds/streeter_great_diamonds/page_200

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]