Talk:Alabama State Route 73

Alabama State Route 73 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 27, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

U.S. Roads: Alabama Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations

Alabama

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in October 2014.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alabama State Route 73/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 15:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doin... CrowzRSA 15:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've copyedited the page some, but since I'm new to reviewing these kind of articles, so I have a couple questions:

All of the prose that is presented is only verified by maps, is that really okay? Articles similar to this like Illinois Route 103 and New Jersey Route 10 site more than just maps, but this article only has maps…
Shouldn't there be a map? Or is that not required…

Regarding maps as sources, they are okay in GAs as several USRD GAs rely on map sources, see User:Moabdave/maps. As for a map in the infobox, it is not necessarily a requirement for GA. Dough 48 72 16:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's all I needed to know. The article now, although short, meets the GA criteria. CrowzRSA 19:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Alabama State Route 73. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]