Talk:Alamo Bowl

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Big 12 Conference, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the American college athletic conference on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Big 12 ConferenceWikipedia:WikiProject Big 12 ConferenceTemplate:WikiProject Big 12 ConferenceBig 12 Conference articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas / WikiProject San Antonio Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject San Antonio.

College football Mid‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rankings and Home/Visitor[edit]

I went through the Alamo Bowl website and archived information on the Internet to add rankings and home/visitor designations to the Previous Results chart. I also removed the intro paragraph about the 1947 game, since it's already wiki-linked at the top of the article. Last, I added the paragraph about the Alamo Bowl's only overtime game. Clipper471 00:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! I especiallly like the table featuring the team ranking and also the attendance. Best, Johntex\^talk 09:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is MasterCard no longer title sponsor?[edit]

How? There has been no alert I've seen that MasterCard has pulled the plugSoxrock 17:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that they decided to not renew the deal for another year. And why should MasterCard notify everyone that they didn't? It could create bad publicity. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to split[edit]

There is absolutely no reason why Alamo Bowl broadcasters should be split from Alamo Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 4kb long. The main article is 13kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 17kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Reywas92 ^Talk 17:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two 2016 Alamo Bowls[edit]

I'm trying to update/fix the infobox, which previously didn't include the results of the latest game. The linking is off, the problem being the fact that there are (or will be) two "2016 Alamo Bowl"s: the one that took place on January 2, 2016 and the one that takes place on December 29, 2016. Any ideas on how to clarify/fix this? Should the current Wiki article titled 2016 Alamo Bowl be renamed "January 2016 Alamo Bowl"? Any suggestions/help would be great. Thanks.Pistongrinder (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has actually happened before with the two Alamo Bowls in 2010. The articles for this will be 2016 Alamo Bowl (January) and 2016 Alamo Bowl (December), just like the 2010 Alamo Bowl (January) and 2010 Alamo Bowl (December). OCNative (talk) 00:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help (on this page and the other one)!Pistongrinder (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031084227/http://www.alamobowl.com/pdf/mg06_1-of-3.pdf to http://www.alamobowl.com/pdf/mg06_1-of-3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]