Talk:Alamo Heights, Texas

Median Home Value

Ok, let's bring this back to earth. This was just changed to 499k, which is just a little bit on the high side. The previous number was $399k as cited, but that was only for one section of AH (the cite did not cover areas in AH with median values of $227k, $218k, and $198k. For right now, I'm reverting it back to the 2000 census number of $198,800 until someone can provide a more accurate cite. Kuru ^talk 23:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

We should try to bring this more into the present. We all know that almost no house (save for dumps) in Alamo Heights is valued at less than $200,000, or even $300,000. The typical price per square foot in the area is about $200, and the smallest houses are about 1,000 SF. Zillow (not the best source) says the current median list price is $438,000 [1]. Perhaps a better value can be found somewhere. Where that is I don't know. I do believe $198,000 is misleading though. 209.184.178.1 (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Si. Ten year old property values are useless. Median list prices are not the same thing. Maybe there's something new in the census data - will check. Kuru (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree that a median list price is not a great indicator of "value." But that was the best available with a quick Google search. Hopefully a better statistic can be found. I will also try looking on the Census website. 209.184.178.1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC).

The American Community Survey part of the Census is the one that goes down to the "minor" city level; it does not appear to have been updated with cities under populations of 20,000 since 2000 (see here). It's a damn shame BCAD doesn't have better reporting tools, unless I'm missing something. Still poking about. Kuru (talk) 22:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, BCAD probably would not work. Unless you wanted to do the math yourself. I imagine there are at least a couple of thousand residential properties in AH, so that would be essentially impossible. We will have to wait until the latest census data is published, probably later this year or early next.75.1.165.148 (talk) 04:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

It's fairly clear from spot checking on BCAD and looking at the 10-year assessed values that the values have risen rapidly over the last decade - I wouldn't object to simply removing that line, as it is quite misleading at this point. Of course, quite a bit of our census related data on smaller incorporated areas is quickly becoming out of date (median incomes, etc)... :( Kuru (talk) 04:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamo Heights, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alamo Heights, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)