This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
I thought it might be a useful bit of tidying up to merge in Seibel grapes, which is not much more than a list at present. You can then have {{main}} links to full articles on the few varieties that are commercially significant, and this page might have a simple note on parentage for the remainder. I'm not 100% about this, I remain open to persuasion either way, but I thought it was worth discussion. At present I support a merger. FlagSteward 12:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've been thinking about this one too but in a slightly different direction. I was thinking of merging the stub Seibel grape articles (like Aurore, Plantet, De Chaunac, etc) into the Seibel grape article and then doing a spin off List of Seibel grapes-since most Seibel grapes will never merit an article. I think this article should remained focus on the biography on Albert Seibel but I can picture a nice Seibel grape article with paragraphs on the most notable grapes and a link to a sub article with a general listing. AgneCheese/Wine 18:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since there clearly is no consensus to merge, I will remove the merge tags. --Bduke 08:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Albert Seibel/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Seibel is a High importance but Jaeger is a low importance? Given that the emphasis within WP is more focussed on grapes and regions at the moment, I've downgraded this to a Mid importance
FlagSteward 19:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 19:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 07:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
