Talk:Aldwych farce

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of Aldwych farces[edit]

Having checked the reviews and classified theatre ads in The Times for the years in question, I have changed the list of Aldwych farces thus:

Added Fifty-Fifty
Removed:
- The Three Graces (a musical comedy at the Empire)
- Chastity, My Brother (a serious religious play by Travers, staged at the Embassy)
- O Mistress Mine (a Travers play, but not an Aldwych farce, presented at the St James's)
- Mischief (ditto, presented at the Fortune).

Tim riley (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Are you satisfied that the films list is the appropriate list? -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to BFI, it seems pretty complete. I also took the trouble to reduce the green tint in the lede image. -- Cassianto ^Talk 20:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super work, Tim. This is 10x better. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aldwych farce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916142827/http://www.britishpictures.com/stars/Walls.htm to http://www.britishpictures.com/stars/Walls.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]