Talk:Alert Ready

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alert Ready. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big fail in New Brunswick: Excluding everyone who did not buy their smartphone at Rogers ...[edit]

... and also excluding all foreign tourists and travelers in New Brunswick, Canada. There is a list of phone models where the alarm is supposed to work with, but if the owner (like a New Brunswick resident) bought the phone model from someone else than from monopolist Rogers, like as unlocked smartphone in the U.S. or the EU, the alarm will not work in New Brunswick. This has clearly shown during the public test of AlertReady in 2019. Who on the side of AlertReady is responsible for such obvious favoritism? This is not (at least) bordering unfair business practices but indeed endangering everyone who does not own a cellphone contract with Rogers. This is still a matter for the press to inquire yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.224.168.157 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]