Talk:Alesha Dixon/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
::In the section about Products and endorsements, there's a line about instruments being used which is as quotes "Door harp, the Clutch guitar and the Hatchback kick drum". There is no need to have the first letter of each instrument being capitalised. Small case letters are sufficient.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
:: The infobox giving brief details about Alesha Dixon shows all the record labels she's been associated with. However, they do not show the dates during which she was contracted with them. Please include the dates, as readers looking at this may see it as Alesha Dixon is still contracted to all 3 labels. If you need an example on how to do this, then view Celine Dion, and there you will the dates the artist has been with each record label.
~~Include brief information about the Alesha Dixon being contracted to the new record label, in the lead paragraph. This seems to be missing.~~

The a section in the lead paragraph also reads as though it was Alesha who left Polydor on her own accord, yet further down in the article you've included a quote, which states Polydor dropped Alesha from their label. Please clarify which is correct, and modify accordingly.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

—Pr3st0n (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm just sorting out the manual of style details now, thanks for the advice --Patyo1994 (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]