Talk:Alexandre de Moraes
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
MP associations speak out against Alexandre's statement[edit]
The National Association of Members of the Public Ministry and the National Association of Public Prosecutors released a note on the statement by Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the Supreme Federal Court, for whom there is no investigation monopoly of the Public Ministry.
National Association of Members of the Public Prosecutor's Office (Conamp) and the National Association of Public Prosecutors (ANPR) come out to the public to express their totally contrary position, given the manifestation made this Wednesday (17th) by the Minister of the Supreme Federal Court, Alexandre de Moraes, in the sense that all Courts can open criminal investigations. The accusatory system is one of the main civilizing achievements of modern democracies. For him, different actors are charged with the functions of investigating, accusing, defending and judging. When the magistrates themselves are in charge of functions related to other actors, such as investigating and accusing, one of the most important principles that should guide the performance of the judges remains, which is impartiality. In the Brazilian legal system, the Public Prosecution Service, the Judiciary Police and other control bodies are conferred the investigative function, and it is essential that there is also respect, by the Judiciary, of the prerogatives inherent in other organs and institutions in the country.[1]