Talk:Ali Fadhul

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ali Fadhul article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Ali Fadhul was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 November 2021.

Wikipedia

A fact from Ali Fadhul appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Ugandan rebels did not recognize Ali Fadhul as the enemy commander when he drove past them during an invasion of Uganda in 1972?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ali Fadhul.

Wikipedia

Africa: Uganda Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Uganda portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Biography / African / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	African military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Fadhul's name[edit]

I don't think "Walls" is a part of his name; this seems a mistransliteration. Waris/Warris seems to be more likely, as per these sources:

-Indy beetle (talk) 21:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have adjusted the article accordingly. Applodion (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Seven Pandas (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Ugandan rebels did not recognize Ali Fadhul as enemy commander when he drove past them during an invasion of Uganda in 1972? (Source: "As they [the rebels] proceeded north, the convoy happened to pass a civilian vehicle that Lieutenant Colonel Ali Fadhul, the commander of the Simba Battalion, was driving toward the border on a reconnaissance mission. The enemy officer sped past them, unrecognized [...]" (Rice, Andrew (2009). The Teeth May Smile But the Heart Does Not Forget: Murder and Memory in Uganda, p. 180)

Reviewed: Kyūroku-jima

Created by Applodion (talk). Self-nominated at 21:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

, Applodion, Hi friend. The article is overall... overwhelmingly sourced and interesting. But going to the point, what you want to feature as DYK is verified. Sourced I mean, I see no problem in approving this. As I said, it's really sourced and cites extra-reading. I was going to ask you to add some sources in the lead but I remembered that by MOS date, there are no sources to be put there. Great work. Cheers and hugs ^_^ CoryGlee (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No source which describes the king’s African Rifles as the King’s Army rifle is reliable in any ordinary sense[edit]

Discuss. Qwirkle (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. No discussion neccessary. The Daily Monitor is a Ugandan newspaper, used in hundreds of articles of Wikipedia. It is active since three decades, and has even endured suppression by the government due to independent reporting. It is fully reliable, which was already discussed in several FA reviews here on Wikipedia. Applodion (talk) 23:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this article quoted is typical, then that is merely a reflection of Wikipedia’s unfortunately low standards; if this article is not typical, perhaps you should find a better source. Qwirkle (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, reviewers of the Featured article process (which is literally the most high quality review process on Wikipedia) judged Daily Monitor to be reliable. In addition academics repeatedly quote and use the newspaper as a source. So no, no "unfortunately low standards" neccessary. Applodion (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reiterate what Applodion has said. The Daily Monitor is Uganda’s largest private daily and quoted in books for information on Ugandan affairs and respected for its independence from the government. I personally know an academic who writes as a columnist for the paper. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

…Ahh, we have gone from the “it’s just a typo” and playing the victim card to “I personally know…” As I’ve already written, if this is their usual calibre, than some of that repect is unearned; if it isn’t, perhaps a better cite, even from the same paper, should surely be straightforward to find. Qwirkle (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting I have a COI? It’s a former professor of mine. Yes, African media generally isn’t on par with the NYT but the monitor is the closest you’ll get to a Ugandan newspaper of record. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have serious objections, why not open a RSN discussion? -Indy beetle (talk) 23:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a serious belief this source is actually reliable, why not “correct” the article to reflect it? Qwirkle (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is correct as it is, with everything reliably sourced. That's the whole point. Applodion (talk) 09:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, you have something you claim to be a reliable source, used to support a claim it contradicts, and you can’t see why that might be a bad thing? Qwirkle (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwirkle: I don’t see why the snark was called for. -Indy beetle (talk) 14:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the source does not "contradict" anything. So I don't see what you are trying to achieve here, Qwirkle. Applodion (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]