Talk:Alice de Janzé

Alice de Janzé was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alice de Janzé/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article for possible GA status. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I believe this article is not up to GA standards at this time. Please feel free to renominate once the below concerns have been addressed. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and formatting[edit]

Underlinked - please add more internal links to satisfy WP:Build the web. There are also some inappropriate links - for example, why does "eponymous" link to "White Mischief", especially given that that article is already linked at the beginning of the section? CHECK
Biographical articles should have WP:Persondata CHECK
Make sure all occurrences of "Janzé" have the correct accent. Name consistency is a general issue - for example, Ogden vs Odgen, de Trafford vs De Trafford
Numerous typos and grammatical errors - please copy-edit thoroughly
Organization needs work. Too many subheadings under "Biography". Could even make these headings and remove "Biography. Subheadings are inconsistent and at times confusing or unnecessarily complicated. Could combine "White Mischief" and "In culture" (and possibly "Descendants") into "Legacy"
Avoid run-on sentences and short one- to two-sentence paragraphs
Per WP:MOS, italics are only used for quotations if they are present in the original CHECK
The two list-like sections should become prose
Wikilinks in the article text should not be duplicated in "See also" CHECK

Accuracy and verifiability[edit]

There are several contradictions in the article. For example, the lead claims she died in October, while the infobox says September CHECK
Be careful to reproduce direct quotes exactly, and double-check for inconsistencies
"In culture" and "Descendants" both need more citations
Need more consistency in referencing format. Newspapers and books need page numbers; websites need accessdates, titles and publishers. Check for typos and errors in referencing
Blogs do not qualify as reliable sources CHECK
I have serious doubts about the reliability of the Frances Osborne article, given its language and obvious elaboration
Be sure to differentiate between titles and subtitles when referencing newspapers - ref 36 gives the wrong title CHECK
The external links add absolutely nothing of value and should be removed CHECK

Broad[edit]

More relevant details needed, more irrelevant details should be removed. For example, a brief explanation of "happy Valley set" would be helpful in addition to the linked article, but there's no need to include information on who else was held in the same jail cell

Neutrality[edit]

Please see WP:WTA and WP:WEASEL - certain words introduce an editorial bias and should be avoided
Even if everything in the article is cited, it's still necessary to write it according to NPOV, avoiding judgment and editorialization

Stability[edit]

No issues - largely the work of a single contributor. I would suggest getting someone else to read over the article, just to get another opinion CHECK

Images[edit]

You needn't bold her name in image captions, except maybe the one in the infobox CHECK
Date for the infobox image needs to be fixed - should reflect the date the image was taken/published, not the date it was uploaded CHECK
Check consistency between the description given for Alice_silverthorne.jpg and the corresponding information at the source link CHECK
You should probably refer to her as "Alice Silverthorne" or simply "Alice" in the captions of images taken before her marriage. Also, make sure that your captions are verifiable - you don't know that she was 20 in a certain picture because only the year is provided, thus it could have been taken before or after her birthday CHECK
HappyValley.jpg - Trzebinski is not the sole author of that book
The FUR for AliceFred.jpg claims that it is the only available picture to illustrate Frederic de Janze - this is untrue, as he is included in the Happy Valley image. Furthermore, the fair-use newspaper tag clearly indicates that "Use of the image merely to depict a person or persons in the image will be removed." A similar issue exists for the obituary photo CHECK
Why is her obituary photo included alongside the section about Erroll's murder? CHECK
Sarahmiles.jpg includes no fair-use rationale, and no copyright information CHECK

Bibliography[edit]

I can't do it

Spicer, Paul (2010). The Temptress: The scandalous life of Alice, Countess de Janzé. London: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-84737-782-1.

and there is a link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric_de_Janz%C3%A9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.104.57.144 (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alice de Janzé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218192844/http://www.ilsos.gov:80/GenealogyMWeb/marrsrch.html to http://www.ilsos.gov/GenealogyMWeb/marrsrch.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alice de Janzé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Count of Janzé[edit]

Why people says "De Janzé" when it's spelled "Janzé", without the "of", when the title is not here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 04:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]